not one for conspiracy theories but... https://bthedeadtalkdeadrekindledforums.runboard.com/t221 Runboard| not one for conspiracy theories but... en-us Fri, 29 Mar 2024 11:30:24 +0000 Fri, 29 Mar 2024 11:30:24 +0000 https://www.runboard.com/ rssfeeds_managingeditor@runboard.com (Runboard.com RSS feeds managing editor) rssfeeds_webmaster@runboard.com (Runboard.com RSS feeds webmaster) akBBS 60 Re: not one for conspiracy theories but...https://bthedeadtalkdeadrekindledforums.runboard.com/p2171,from=rss#post2171https://bthedeadtalkdeadrekindledforums.runboard.com/p2171,from=rss#post2171I don't think there is a conspiracy, but I have a few questions. 1)What was the protusion on the underbelly of the jet? 2)What exactly was the flash that was seen? Note: I saw the flash in some of the footage that was shown on air. All else is unsubstantiated prattling done by the talking heads of America's great news organizations. What about the fake lunar landing?nondisclosed_email@example.com (abaddon1215)Mon, 21 Feb 2005 03:56:39 +0000 Re: not one for conspiracy theories but...https://bthedeadtalkdeadrekindledforums.runboard.com/p2170,from=rss#post2170https://bthedeadtalkdeadrekindledforums.runboard.com/p2170,from=rss#post2170I liked what you said. I guess we can never really be sure whether stated fact (in this case), is fact. Though, for me this documentary look starkly compelling. There are news reports and people stating on the day that one of the planes that hit the wtc's looked nothing like a commercial jet. Yes. and more importantly from this new documentary there is genuine video and photographs to in someway back up this claim. Maybe there'll open up a another enquiry to investigate these claims soon, who knows. I think i'll keep an open mind, we'll never be sure. Let's just wait and see if anything happens with this. One thing I'm sure of is that the middle-east is on the verge of breakdown; I'm just wondering which countries Bush and Blair will attack next. nondisclosed_email@example.com (knights)Sun, 20 Feb 2005 15:27:23 +0000 Re: not one for conspiracy theories but...https://bthedeadtalkdeadrekindledforums.runboard.com/p2169,from=rss#post2169https://bthedeadtalkdeadrekindledforums.runboard.com/p2169,from=rss#post2169I've heard conspiracy theories about 9/ll, stating that "you know who" had something to gain by the event. However, this film seems to be the work of a "bomb-thrower". The remarks of reporters are cited as fact...but, believe me, there were differences in the reports given on 9/ll. I know this because I WATCHED THE NEWS ON 9/11. Not just one channel. Fox, CNN, CBS, and CNBC....maybe MSNBC. The hole in the Pentagon looked MUCH bigger than only sixteen feet. As I remember, the plane was obscured from view(possible already removed?), the outer wall was leaning, and upper floors were visible. Peculiar-YES!-but proof of a conspiracy to bring democracy in Afghanistan and Iraq....perhaps and it is, even today, evil. What was the "protrusion on bottom of the plane"? Was this George Bush's flagrant desire to become the world's HIGH LORD OF OIL AND HEROINE? One would think so. This also sheds disturbing new light on the mysterious flash given off by the jets that collided with the twin towers. Obviously, that flash was pure ego, never seen in such intensity before. I don't recall hearing anything about a "massive crater" in front of the Pentagon on 9/11. I did hear that the plane nearly missed the building; that it flew so low on approach that it narrowly missed hitting the building. This was said to be based on eyewitness reports, LIKELY NOT PENTAGON EMPLOYEES who were possibly asked not to talk to the media, but probably folk such as truck drivers, telemarketers, bored disc jockeys, and Waffle House waitresses. Also, there was an initial gap in the Pentagon coverage because New York looked like a war zone at that particular moment, and that is what the media wanted to show us. Nevermind the fact that reporters were busy, clamoring to get a grasp on the New York situation. Anyway, let's use falsehoods in media coverage to prove....something, but what? Comeback when there's real evidence. And everyone that might own a brain already knows who FOXNEWS loves. I vote to retitle this "must see blockbuster DVD": 9/ll or the Bush Dynasty Conspiracy To Rule Heroine and Oil, But Forget the Saudi Royal Family(Who We Claim Are Friends of GWB Whenever This Is Beneficial To His Political Rivals But When This Might Disprove Our Claims, We Conveniently Forget). Doesn't this go against the prevailing wisdom of the moment, that AMERICA DESERVED 9/11 aka 9/ll IS JUSTICE FOR EVIL FOREIGN POLICY? If this is the way of the world, the French, British, Chinese, Russians, Germans, Japanese, and all others need to hold their hats because something big might be coming their way. New Motto: Somewhere in this big world, Canada is someone's Afghanistan. Give peace a chance. Don't hijack aircraft. Don't become enraged because communism exists. And, above all, DO NOT MAKE A DOCUMENTARY THAT IS LARGELY BASED ON NEWS REPORTS.nondisclosed_email@example.com (abaddon1215)Sun, 20 Feb 2005 05:04:00 +0000 Re: not one for conspiracy theories but...https://bthedeadtalkdeadrekindledforums.runboard.com/p2168,from=rss#post2168https://bthedeadtalkdeadrekindledforums.runboard.com/p2168,from=rss#post2168This is probobly in the wrong thread but what the hell..enjoy http://www.deathonline.net/movies/autopsy.cfm nondisclosed_email@example.com (hollow)Sat, 19 Feb 2005 18:44:08 +0000 Re: not one for conspiracy theories but...https://bthedeadtalkdeadrekindledforums.runboard.com/p2167,from=rss#post2167https://bthedeadtalkdeadrekindledforums.runboard.com/p2167,from=rss#post2167I like your style knights.. nondisclosed_email@example.com (hollow)Sat, 19 Feb 2005 18:27:47 +0000 not one for conspiracy theories but...https://bthedeadtalkdeadrekindledforums.runboard.com/p2166,from=rss#post2166https://bthedeadtalkdeadrekindledforums.runboard.com/p2166,from=rss#post2166http://www.911inplanesite.com/ -ak nondisclosed_email@example.com (knights)Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:05:01 +0000